It is very nice to visit Lambda facility and thanks to warm welcome provided by all the teams. I can easily say one of the best CRO I ever visited. People here are wonderful and doing great job

Reputed Client of Israel

Awesome hospitality & fantastic office. All the best!

Reputed Client of Japan

Excellent hospitality and cooperation received throughout the audit. People are knowledgeable and extremely transparent. Looking for long time relation

Reputed Client of Asia

Facility is too good to conduct the BABE studies and adherence to protocol and quality assurance in conducting studies are meeting sponsor expectations and requirements.

Reputed Client of India

Facility is good, people r trained well and know the subject on which they r working. All the best.

Reputed Client of USA

Highly innovative and advanced research centre that possess bright future for the development of the country.

Reputed International Government Body

It is one of the best facility in India for BA/BE

Reputed Regulatory Authority

Lambda is a very professional CRO. All the staff here are experienced and very knowledgeable. I'm grateful for their accommodations and hospitality. The future, if we want to carry out BE study, we will ask Lambda help again.

Reputed Client of Europe

It was a really pleasant meeting with the PV department, and I am looking forward to the next visit.

Reputed Client of Europe

Amazing and best CRO I ever seen

Reputed Client of China



Home / Blog

Journal Peer Review Process: An Overview

14 Sep 2017

Articles and manuscripts written by researchers and academicians are published in journals which are available in the public domain. This adds responsibility on the authors, editors and reviewers to follow the highest standards of publication processes. Peer review process is an important aspect, can be even said pivotal in scientific publications, and reviewers help in evaluating the results for competence, significance and originality. Although, dictionary defines ‘peer’ as one of equal standing, ‘peer review’ in the context of journals happen by very experienced professionals or experts in the respective fields/domains, which helps in validating the research and also in improving the quality of the article.

Nearly three and half centuries ago in 1600s, when a collection of scientific essays by Denis de Sallo was being submitted in the journal ‘des Scavans’, the aim was to disseminate the findings without any thought of peer review or to check for accuracy or authenticity of the report. The first instance of a peer review occurred later in 1731, when the Royal Society of Edinburg published a collection of articles, which the editor got reviewed from people whom he considered as experts in the field. But the Royal Society of Edinburg provided a disclaimer that peer review did not ensure authenticity or accuracy. Peer review evolved very gradually with some journals getting the submitted content reviewed internally. Finally in 1893, the British Medical Journal got each noneditorial article reviewed by a well-known expert.

Peer review process became more organized and standardized in the last century as scientific research increased and many new journals came into existence. In the initial days, there were very few research manuscripts submissions, hence, the editors, especially from the new journals, had to look for the content to fill their journals without the luxury of being selective. But with the exponential increase in scientific research because of the increased acceptance of evidence based medicine, the editors had to be very selective in choosing the papers they wanted to publish in their journals. Also, with science and technology advancing by leaps and bounds, many specialties have emerged requiring expertise to understand the sophisticated research; however, many editors may not have the capabilities or depth in the subject. Hence, peer review process involving experts in respective specialties or domains is essential for publications in journals.

Currently, the peer review process is followed by almost all journals. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) defines peer review as: “peer review is the critical assessment of manuscripts submitted to journals by experts who are not part of the editorial staff.” The peer review process follows after the initial review by the editors to see if the paper first fits into the scope of the journal and their guidelines as defined in their editorial policy. The paper is then circulated to experts, usually to more than one, in their respective specialties for peer review. Peer review process helps to bring in the context of the research; the methods adopted, and tries to ensure that the research has been done in a fair, authentic, ethical and as accurate as possible.

Looking for a Globally Proven Research Partner?

Contact Us