Testimonials

It is very nice to visit Lambda facility and thanks to warm welcome provided by all the teams. I can easily say one of the best CRO I ever visited. People here are wonderful and doing great job

Reputed Client of Israel

Awesome hospitality & fantastic office. All the best!

Reputed Client of Japan

Excellent hospitality and cooperation received throughout the audit. People are knowledgeable and extremely transparent. Looking for long time relation

Reputed Client of Asia

Facility is too good to conduct the BABE studies and adherence to protocol and quality assurance in conducting studies are meeting sponsor expectations and requirements.

Reputed Client of India

Facility is good, people r trained well and know the subject on which they r working. All the best.

Reputed Client of USA

Highly innovative and advanced research centre that possess bright future for the development of the country.

Reputed International Government Body

It is one of the best facility in India for BA/BE

Reputed Regulatory Authority

Lambda is a very professional CRO. All the staff here are experienced and very knowledgeable. I'm grateful for their accommodations and hospitality. The future, if we want to carry out BE study, we will ask Lambda help again.

Reputed Client of Europe

It was a really pleasant meeting with the PV department, and I am looking forward to the next visit.

Reputed Client of Europe

Amazing and best CRO I ever seen

Reputed Client of China

Blog

Blog

Home / Blog

Impact of Immunogenicity on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Biosimilars

06 Apr 2023

Due to An increasing utilization and approvals of biosimilars, immunogenicity has become a significant concern which needs to be assessed due to its potential impact on efficacy and safety of the molecule. With the use of biological products, individuals sometimes tend to develop immunogenicity due to which the body's immune system produces anti-drug antibodies (ADA) which further binds to various epitopes of the circulating molecule leading to varying its effects in terms of pharmacokinetics and/or efficacy or safety of the molecule. Some of the common factors contributing to the development of immunogenicity are selection of vector, cell expression system, protein production, purification and validation, physicochemical properties and stability profile of the molecule, patient related intrinsic/extrinsic factors and manufacturing process of the molecule.

Changes in manufacturing process, purification process or post-translational modifications such as glycosylation, phosphorylation, deamination, and oxidation can lead to formation of compounds/intermediates which might ultimately result in immune response against the drug. Furthermore, these changes can sometimes lead to changes in drug structure that can affect either antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) or complement-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (CDC) hampering the efficacy profile of the molecule. Some of the publications analyzed reporting status of immunogenicity data components by reviewing the prescribing information of products approved before February 2015, which is depicted below:

Reporting Status of Immunogenicity Data Components (Reported vs. non reported)

ADA can affect the functioning of the molecule possibly by antigen/receptor binding, fragment antigen-binding region (Fab) associated functions like neutralization, receptor activation or blockade or by Fragment crystallizable region (Fc) associated functions like complement activation, ADCC or CDCC.

Basically, ADA is broadly classified as Neutralizing antibodies (NAb) and Non-Neutralizing antibodies (Non-NAb). As the name indicates, NAbs inhibits or reduces the pharmacological activity of the molecule. These anti-bodies can be identified either by an in-vitro test or animal-based bioassay method. On the contrary, Non-NAbs does not hamper the pharmacological activity of the molecule.

Further, ADA is also bifurcated as drug sustaining ADA response which reduces the clearance of the drug and thereby prolonging its elimination half-life and as clearing ADA response which increases the clearance of drug by any of the following mechanisms (but not limited to): Breakdown, circulating immune complex lattice, Reticuloendothelial system, Fc binding.

Sometimes, ADA formed against a particular mAb can cross-react with other mAbs of murine origin raising drug administration issues of the new mAb. Such ADA are termed as human anti-murine antibody (HAMA). In such cases, frequent assessment of immunogenicity profile can prevent the chances of treatment failure.

Similar to HAMA, anti-bodies can also cross-react with chimeric mAb molecules with non-human epitopes present. This type of ADA is termed as Human anti-chimeric antibody (HACA). When cross-reactivity is observed with other human sequence-based antibodies, this type of ADA is called Human anti-human antibody (HAHA).

Deviating drug levels due to ADA formation delineate an early sign of reduced efficacy during treatment course.

Commonly used ways of assessing the impact of immunogenicity on PK/PD of biologics are depicted below:

Reference:
1. Wang Y, Wang J, Hon Y, Zhou L, Fang L, Ahn H. Evaluating and Reporting the Immunogenicity Impacts for Biological Products—a Clinical Pharmacology Perspective. The AAPS Journal. 2015;18(2):395-403.





Looking for a Globally Proven Research Partner?

Contact Us